“We have news about a participant in the COVID vaccine trial dying. Reuters alleges that this person didn’t get the new vaccine but was a part of the control group.”
Here’s how Reuters reports it, ‘A source familiar with the matter told Reuters the trial would have been suspended if the volunteer who died had received the COVID-19 vaccine, SUGGESTING the person was part of the control group that was given a meningitis jab.'”
David Knight remarks, “Let’s unpack this, they’re saying that they wouldn’t continue with the test if the person had been given the vaccine. They’re just assuming that the government would never do anything unsafe, so we know that if they didn’t stop it then this person must’ve been part of the control group.”
Look at Reuters’ “deductive” reasoning closely:
Premise: Govt and corporations would never do anything to endanger health
Since they didn’t stop the expert, there wasn’t any concern about safety by either government or corporation
Therefore, the person who died must have been in a control group that didn’t get the vaccine
There’s a lot of jumping to conclusions but everything is based on the false premise that government and corporations would never do anything to endanger health. But Fauci, in 1986, as one of his first acts in the position he has now, gave legal immunity to pharmaceutical companies for any vaccine injury or death. What other product has that? None.
But the article also raises even more questions about the control group when Reuters reports the control group got a meningitis vaccine.
Knight continues, “And what did they give them in the control group? They didn’t get a saline solution or similar to be safe, no, they were given a meningitis jab. So this person gets a COVID jab or a meningitis jab and dies? I thought all vaccines were safe? We aren’t talking about people with multiple co-morbidities, they don’t select them for the test, they select healthy individuals. So they’re alleging that this person died from the meningitis jab instead of a COVID jab.
“Maybe not all vaccines are safe, maybe that’s why Fauci had to give them legal immunity from adverse effects like injury and death in 1986,” said Knight.
“If they’re part of the control group, why wouldn’t they just give them a placebo instead of a meningitis vaccine? A listener had a great comment about that, he said it makes perfect sense from BigPharma’s perspective. They know very well that the meningitis vaccine can lead to all sorts of harm so in the final analysis, they can compare the adverse reactions of their vaccine against the adverse reactions of another vaccine that has already been deemed to be ‘safe’. This way they can demonstrate that no statistical correlation exists between the new vaccine and increased incidents of side effects.”
“We just had a story happen the same day, ‘Deaths After Flu Shots in South Korea Fan Fears But Authorities Find No Link.’ This is always the way it happens. You can have people drop dead in the office and nothing, we see this over and over again. Here’s how Reuters reports on this story, ‘We came to the conclusion that the deaths had no direct relations with the vaccination given the limited data we have now and without detailed post mortem reports.’ “
“They don’t have any detailed post mortem reports so what did they base this decision on? ‘We have limited data and no post mortem but we’ve already decided.’ I said from the very beginning, they’ve already decided these deaths don’t have anything to do with their vaccines.”
“Then they say that some of those that died had underlying conditions. For COVID deaths we have a standard where, even though the average patient who dies of COVID had 2.6 potentially fatal underlying conditions, we still count it as a COVID death. Each of the average 2.6 underlying conditions would be enough to kill you by themselves, but if you tested positive for COVID, you died from COVID. So if we apply the SAME standard, they ALL died from the vaccine. But we don’t have the same standard applied to this.”
“The way Reuters reported the deaths of the people in the [COVID] vaccine test, it’s implied that they’ve given this vaccine to tens of thousands of people. They’ve only selected 8,000 people and they’ve just started giving some doses in 6 cities. Reuters implies tens of thousands so if you’ve got a few people who drop dead it’s nothing to worry about.”
“Except we do care when it’s COVID, we had a 20-year-old die from COVID, yes he did have leukemia but don’t pay any attention to that. If you die WITH COVID you died FROM COVID but if you died WITH an experimental VACCINE you couldn’t have died from it. For COVID, 1 death is unacceptable, but that’s not the same standard they use for the vaccine.”
“Some of the COVID vaccines use adenoviruses as a ‘vector to carry in the surface protein gene of SARS-CoV-2’ as Science magazine puts it. The Lancet raised a warning flag about this because the adenovirus was used in the same way for an HIV vaccine back in 2007 that wound up RAISING the risk of contracting AIDS. Fauci was ‘Mr. AIDS’, does he not know about this? Maybe he has amnesia about this as he does about the 2005 NIH study on hydroxychloroquine that found it to be safe and effective. Or maybe he doesn’t really care and it’s all about the money to him,” concluded Knight.
