“Fauci has finally confirmed that children don’t catch or transmit COVID in large numbers, imagine that. THAT is one of the dead giveaways that this is a construct, not a pandemic. If you look at the demographics of the deaths, they start at about 65 then go up exponentially, kinda like natural causes. In reality, it’s statistically ZERO if you’re under 45 or so,” reported Knight on 12/1/2020’s show.
“THAT [limited demographic risk] is very different from the 1918 pandemic, The 1918 pandemic was evenly distributed across all age groups. There was a spike for those under 1 or over 80 because they’re frail, other than that it was evenly distributed. This isn’t a pandemic, this is a piece of statistical propaganda.”
“Rand Paul took on Fauci in a hearing where Fauci finally admitted that children do not get terribly ill from COVID. Now that they believe Trump is leaving office they can ease up some. You’ve got to get the kids back in school, got to prepare that next generation to be like the Antifa idiots in Seattle. That’s the product of the government school system. The school system is the very last thing I would open up, I would keep it closed forever.”
“Rand Paul pointed out Sweden’s experience, the fact that they never closed their primary schools and never saw a spike in illness. Germany also opened their schools in July with no significant issues. Since the summer, most industrialized countries have reopened their schools without enforced distancing or mask-wearing but not here in America. Why is that? Because of that liar Fauci.”
“The primary victim of this virus isn’t the elderly, it primarily kills the Middle Class, because this is a political virus. It also kills the integrity of politicians and media whores who push this lie. And it kills our culture and the Constitution.”
In the hearing, Rand Paul had this to say to Fauci, “Studies show that recovering COVID-19 patients, from the asymptomatic to the very sick, are showing significant antibody response. Studies show that SARS and MERS, also coronaviruses, induce immunity for at least two to three years. And yet the media continues to report that we have no evidence that patients who survived coronavirus have immunity. I think, actually, the truth is the opposite, we have no evidence that survivors of coronavirus don’t have immunity and a great deal of evidence that they do.”
Rand Paul continued, “The question of immunity is linked to health policy in that workers who’ve gained immunity can be a strong part of economic recovery. The silver lining to so many infections in the meat processing industry is that a large portion of these workers now have immunity. Those workers should be reassured that they likely won’t get it again instead of being alarmed by media reports that there is no evidence of immunity.”
Knight comments, “Notice that he mentioned the meat processing industry. I don’t care if they open the schools, they ought to keep those indoctrination centers closed. But they’re going to shut down food processing plants and grocery stores, in fact, they’re already doing it. Why? Because somebody tested positive with a test that doesn’t measure quantity and gives over 90% false-positive rate.”
Senator Paul then directly asked Fauci, “You’ve stated publicly that you’d bet it all that survivors of coronavirus have some form of immunity. Can you help set the record straight that the scientific record, as it is being accumulated, is supportive that infection with coronavirus likely leads to some form of immunity?”
Fauci replied, “Thank you for the question, Senator Paul. Yes, you are correct that I have said that given what we know about the recovery from viruses such as coronaviruses in general, or even any infectious diseases with very few exceptions, that when you have antibodies present it very likely indicates a degree of protection. I think it’s in the semantics of how this is expressed when you say has it been formally proven by long-term natural history studies. Which is the only way that you can prove, one, is it protective, which I said and will repeat, it’s likely that it is.”
Knight observes, “Think about what this liar is selling you on vaccines. They have a vaccine they say is 90%, 95%, effective, whatever numbers they decide to use. Based on what? Based on what they say they’ve seen with antibodies. However, if you have antibodies because you survived this ‘deadly’ disease, they don’t know if those are any good without a LONG-TERM study. They didn’t do a long-term study on the vaccine, only TWO MONTHS. There are people who’ve had natural antibodies for a lot longer than two months. Do you hear the duplicity and the lies in what he’s saying?”
The tests for vaccine are SUPPOSED to be LONG-TERM. These tests on a novel gene modifying vaccine were SUPPOSED to last TWO YEARS. They declared it totally safe and effective after only TWO MONTHS.
See the full report above.
